Skip to content

Fix README glitch#35

Open
lucperkins wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-readme-glitch
Open

Fix README glitch#35
lucperkins wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-readme-glitch

Conversation

@lucperkins
Copy link
Member

@lucperkins lucperkins commented Nov 3, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Table looks pretty rough:

image

This should help.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated workflow output examples to use shortened notation for improved readability in the documentation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

README.md documentation updated in the Workflow outputs section. Three table rows containing example output values were replaced with abbreviated forms using ellipses to shorten their display representation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation Updates
README.md		 Workflow outputs table rows updated with abbreviated example values ending in ellipses for flake_version, flakeref_exact, and flakeref_at_least

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • No functional code changes; purely cosmetic documentation updates
  • Example value abbreviations for readability

Poem

A rabbit hops through docs with glee, 🐰
Trimming long examples with "...", you see
Shorter, sweeter, the table's now neat,
Documentation polish makes the update complete! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Fix README glitch' is directly related to the changeset, which involves fixing documentation in README.md by replacing table rows with shortened example values. The title accurately reflects the main change from the developer's perspective, though it is somewhat generic and doesn't specify what the glitch is.
Description check ✅ Passed The pull request description is minimal but contextually relevant, showing a screenshot of the issue (rough-looking table) and indicating the fix should improve the appearance. However, it lacks the detail specified in the description template, which recommends formatting instructions. The description is brief and provides minimal context about what exactly was changed or why, though it does convey the intent to make the README prettier.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-readme-glitch
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e257db1 and 6b48d35.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: DeterminateCI / build (x86_64-linux, ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

212-214: Improves table readability in documentation.

Using ellipses to abbreviate the long example output values is a sensible documentation practice. This reduces visual clutter in the Workflow outputs table while still clearly conveying the format of each output without loss of meaning.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cole-h cole-h cole-h approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lucperkins @cole-h